Transportation Planner Required

One of our clients, well known & growing foodservice company with outlet chains in all main cities in Indonesia (placement in head quarter Jakarta) currently looking for candidate to oversee and manage their delivery team and fleets. Attractive remuneration package will be available for selected candidate.

Transportation Planner

Job description

Responsibilities

  • Route delivery trucks
  • Coordinate delivery operations with operations management
  • Train drivers in proper handling of product, preparing paperwork and interacting with customers
  • Manage fleets for safety, cleanliness and efficient operation
  • Work with drivers to improve routes, efficiencies and effective operations

Required Qualifications

  • Education, min S-1
  • Have Driving License “A” would be advantages
  • Strong interpersonal and communication skills
  • Basic computer software skills
  • Experience in delivery operations

Preferred Qualifications

1-3 years Supervisory experience in transportation

Submit your application before 28 February 2018 to :

Estiko Fadjar

Email : estikofh [at] gmail.com

Circumstances that Change the Battle Ground

An appropriate improvement programs and structured implementation plan for distribution center advancing to reduces timeframe and promotes the success of programs.

Implementation programs, probably can be invasive, disruptive, and even counter-productive, causing considerable expense, possibilities of wrenching business-process change, and gnawing uncertainty in the minds of employees. Yet surveys show midsize businesses are increasing investment in state of the art of technology for enterprise level system such ERP, WMS, TMS and others to stay competitive, tapped the benefits of integrated data, streamlined processes, managed inventory and other benefits promised. Unfortunately, there is no magic pill guarantees any implementation will be quickly, painless, and successful.

attackA big automotive parts company, which is one of our clients, has already been successful executed improvement programs and create values without risk of catastrophic failure.

Tempting to rebuild a new distribution center blueprint in terms of both capacity and capability, the new design was cost effectively accommodate future growth and advances in technology. It take into account of foresight and forward thinking to successfully converge equipment, software, people and processes in an expanded “house.” Flexibility and scalability become integral design factors to achieve the perfect balance between initial investment and future expandability.

Related to distribution center design and operation, the algorithms alone are insufficient in determining an optimal solution. Without an objective blueprint for design, it can fall into the trap of designing around the promise of a material handling equipment brand rather than blending the ideal equipment, WMS, WCS and associated technologies according to the specific demands of each company’s unique distribution model.

The four smart programs in a new distribution center blueprints:

four-pillars

# 1  Reduce movement to optimize task efficiency.

“Movement” is considered one of the seven (or eight, depending on who’s counting) wastes of lean manufacturing. According to Paul A. Myerson, Professor of Practice in Supply Chain Management at Lehigh University, waste of movement “occurs when temporarily locating, filing, stocking, stacking, or moving materials, people, tools, or information.”

Unnecessary or excess movement can be the result of a combination of factors, ranging from poorly lay out to placing stocks, pass over product velocity and too long inbound travelling path, to inefficient working methods.

To reduce movement, they need to increase operator efficiency, such as with scheduling system. In its simplest form, Wave Planning is considered a “scheduling system for replenishment & picking operation.”  Wave planning builds upon that principle by setting time windows of the replenishment of stocks and or picking operations on the shop floor at the moment that it’s needed. The result is a timely, even flow of goods and worker assignment that eliminates bottlenecks and interruptions.

To further eliminate excess movement, consider locating inventory stocks closer to the pickers access and strategically positioning stock at velocity based locations to maximize the efficient flow of products.

# 2  Improve supply chain scheduling to reduce bottlenecks.

Things don’t always go as planned. Replenishment & fulfillment flow can be greatly impacted by the availability of stocks or by disruptions, such as late receipts of incoming stock, equipment breakdowns, quality rejects, and other issues during inbound process.

With early detection capabilities and real-time access to storage capacity, availability, and interdependencies of resources needed, system, and data, through Advanced Notification System (ASN), however, they have access earlier to the information needed to adjust schedules to accommodate those disruptions. With the right systems in place, they can even determine if change requests are feasible, estimate the impact of those changes on every aspect of end to end warehouse processes, and minimize potential impact on operation.

For the best result, they should avoid making unplanned changes during procurement vis-a-vis inbound operation, and instead attack supply demand problems directly. The scheduling system allows them to model what-if scenarios, their warehouse man can simulate the alternatives so they can choose the best approach.

# 3  Optimize inventory levels to reduce shortages

The distribution center shop floor can’t be productive if don’t have the materials needed for their fulfillment. When they suffer from inventory shortages (whether it’s a result of late deliveries, unexpectedly high reject rates, or short counts), the proper response is not to increase safety stock levels. Not only does this reduce cash flow and increase inventory carrying costs, but their data has shown that increasing safety stock levels isn’t even a sure guarantee against inventory shortages.

Instead, having accurate and timely visibility into their inventory allows them to know exactly what items are running low in stock, detect potential issues, and rectify them before they become real problems. Also, establishing close working relationships with their suppliers can help speed up fulfillment requests. They prioritized some suppliers connect to their system via Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) as well as Web Services. When inventory will run out, then the system trigger automatically to order to supplier for replenishing them.

Sometimes inventory shortages can’t be avoided. In those cases, by the right planning system, they can earlier identify the impact of the shortages and determine how best to redeploy resources in the interim. It’s also a smart idea for them use contingencies built into the plan—such as alternate suppliers and substitute parts—that could be activated on short notice.

# 4  Automate processes with automated data collection

One way to speed up shop floor operations is by automating their shop floor processes with automated data collection tools, like barcoding. With barcoding plus android based mobile devices, key inventory and asset data (such as quantity and location) can be automatically captured and drive the flow of inventory and shop floor assets (such as totes, bins, racks, and pallets). Barcoding and Android based Mobile Devices help speed up data collection and improve data accuracy by bypassing slow and error-prone manual data entry.

Barcoding technologies, can also help reduce processing time of data reading. With barcoding technologies in place, they can automate the gathering and sending of asset information (such as location, product code readings, and storage bin status) without requiring an operator to have direct line of sight or contact with that piece of them. In our proposed plan, the types of information that RFID can gather help them increase capability for identifying patterns by implementing it in the future.

real-time-info

Through complete visibility into every step of shop floor operations, they have access to the information needed to make the most effective usage of constrained resources, find areas where they can increase throughput and efficiency, and promote better material, asset and even their people. Being able to see how all of the pieces fit together—in real time—ultimately helps them operate more efficiently and make better decisions. Onwards, they can identify potential problems earlier, analyze them, discover what’s driving them, and identify solutions before they create bottlenecks.

Project Name & Year : Redesigning The Distribution Center – 2016
Industry Classification : Automotive Parts
Project Location : Jakarta

Sizing up Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP against the competition

In this Q&A, Gartner analyst Nigel Montgomery discusses Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP and how it compares with SAP and other players in the manufacturing ERP space.

Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP software was revamped and released early in 2016 as a cloud-first ERP system. Manufacturers have a lot to like in the new system, as they contemplate moving to the cloud, according to Gartner research director Nigel Montgomery, who covers ERP systems. In the following Q&A, Montgomery discusses Dynamics AX ERP and how it compares with SAP Fiori UX. He also looks at where Dynamics AX ERP fits in the increasingly crowded cloud ERP landscape.


What do you think about Microsoft Dynamics AX ERP?

Nigel Montgomery: The basics of Dynamics AX ERP are good, the product is good, the visualization and the way that I can engage the data and the system is very good. The UI is exceptional; it’s much more flexible than many others out there in the market, so this is all good stuff. The challenge is that, out of the box, it doesn’t handle project-centric as well as it should … therefore, you may need partner add-ons to cover some of those things. I think that’s a challenge, because a lot of those manufacturing organizations are getting increasingly project-centric in terms of the way that they engage both from a customization perspective for an individual customer and also in the way they think about individual projects. So, even a retailer that’s doing a private label-type situation, it’s a project. There needs to be a little bit more of a focus on a project-centric model and bringing in those capabilities that would be needed in such a model — for example, the costing it out, the planning and even the, ‘Can I do this, or should I do this?’ type [of] scenario. They have the delivery mechanism for the information; they just don’t have the system in such a way to be able to collect that. So, it requires… additional work by a partner, which I think they [should bring in] because I don’t think that’s going to get any easier.

What does Dynamics AX ERP do well, and what could it do better?

Montgomery: As a make-to-stock distribute-type model, it’s a very capable tool and has gotten more capable. I think that the warehousing and transportation functions are very good. One of the challenges that I think that Dynamics has is that it was developed to be relatively generic and cross-industry, which is great in some ways. But, in other ways, [it] means that I need somebody else to fine-tune the things for my particular need. This is where the partners come in, but the challenge is that the bigger they are, the less they want to be working with a small partner to do that; they want the system to be configured the way they need it. It will be interesting over time to see as to whether the GSIs [global systems integrators] either buy those smaller partners with that capability or build it. But it seems, to me, logical that it’s going to come from that GSI layer or business integration layer, if you like.


How do you think Dynamics AX UX compares with competitors like SAP’s Fiori UX?

Montgomery: I think the new UX [user experience] is more flexible than whatSAP Fiori can do at this moment, particularly for the different roles that you’ve got within a business or workloads within a business. However, the problem with it is that’s it’s so flexible that you can actually tie yourself up in knots if you’re not careful. So, unfortunately, one of these challenges is that with this flexibility and agility comes risk and management challenges. SAP’s got something that’s more easily structured and, therefore, can be standardized across business units, whereas with AX, it puts this in the users’ hands a little bit — possibly too much. But, at the same time, one of the best parts about it is that freedom to be able to do stuff; it’s just that it puts a certain amount of business management or systems management control onto an organization.

What about some of the other competitors in the ERP space now?

Montgomery: Infor has a very good overall go-to-market model now. They have revolutionized their thinking in some ways now around how they go to market. If you look at what Infor has got and how they enable, while it’s not necessarily geographically the same, their pockets of capability and their overall story [are] very sound. I think we show them in our vendor rating as a promising vendor, because they have most of the bits that they have to do in place. What they just need to do is prove it through adoption, and that takes time. There’s a lot that they can do about it, but I would say that Infor seems to be doing the right things in the right way to set themselves up; and, therefore, they are competitive in some decent-sized deals. So, I think they’ve got a good story.

Are others doing interesting things in the manufacturing space, particularly with regard to cloud adoption, which has been somewhat slow for traditional manufacturers?

Montgomery: There are some of the other players that I think are interesting that are starting to come into the mix. NetSuite has been in the cloud story for a long time, and they have got some manufacturing capability, but it’s not as deep as AX’s — and it’s not as deep as some of the others around the patch, like JD Edwards [EnterpriseOne] and so on. But it is capable, and they have good distribution, good price-management-type situations. So, right now, [it has] a good solution, with good capabilities for the smaller organization. NetSuite can play, but I think this movement to the cloud or the acceptance of the cloud being a delivery model brings a whole bunch of other players into the mix, likeKenandy and Acumatica, that are actually out there doing something now. As the issue of cloud goes away or the acceptance of cloud comes in, whichever way you look at that, these vendors have got a story to tell and they have opportunity as well. And, in a way, that’s what the likes of Microsoft or SAP have got to guard against.

Do you think manufacturers are becoming more comfortable with the idea of moving to the cloud?

Montgomery: It’s just that companies that were against cloud at their manufacturing and operations level, or were hesitant with cloud, that’s starting to go away. So, the more it goes away, the more a cloud-only solution seems like a reasonable idea. Before it was, ‘You don’t do on premises, so I’m not sure I want to play.’ I still think there’s a fair bit of that, but in a lot of cases, it’s becoming more accepted. It certainly is at the SMB level, so I think, realistically, there’s some opportunity there. That now changes the market dynamics, because instead of having two or three vendors that could be your potential vendors, you’ve actually got quite a number of people that could do it. Then, your challenge is how you’re going to select between them, and that’s where [Gartner gets] involved a lot. We get a lot of companies that say, ‘Help us. We’ve got a list here of people as long as your arm. Just help us narrow it down.’ It’s not just about the product; it’s about licensing [and] it’s about how you set it up as a system from a cloud or PaaS [platform as a service] model.

Written by : 

Jim O’Donnell

News Editor

Source : http://searchmanufacturingerp.techtarget.com/

TMS Gets More Warehouse Aware

TMS and YMS expand on integration and supply chain visibility capabilities, gaining a better handle on warehouse constraints in the process.

Whether you call it process orchestration or supply chain execution (SCE) visibility or integration, leading software executives and analysts agree that TMS and YMS are expanding beyond traditional feature sets to help users coordinate overall processes.

The biggest trend within the transportation management system (TMS) and yard management system (YMS) markets is not so much incremental features within each market, but capabilities that blend the two systems together with other supply chain solutions, enhancing visibility in the process.

Whether you call it process orchestration or supply chain execution (SCE) visibility or integration, leading software executives and analysts agree that TMS and YMS are expanding beyond traditional feature sets to help users coordinate overall processes.

“Warehousing, yard and transportation processes are pretty much connected at the hip, but today the systems for these domains are often still run as independent processes,” says Dwight Klappich, a research vice president at Gartner. “You can’t achieve all the benefits if you manage the processes independently instead of seamlessly. That’s why vendors are looking at the intersection points between warehousing, yard and transportation.”

Suppliers are focused on making solutions such as TMS more aware of constraints in warehouses and yards, rather than basing transportation plans solely on traditional factors such as freight cost. YMS, meanwhile, is helping shippers respond to pressures from carriers and also expanding to address the issue of visibility of shipments in transit.

Warehouse aware TMS

The classic problem, says Klappich, is that SCE applications are used in a sequential process without the integration needed to communicate constraints from one domain to another. A common scenario, he says, is for orders to come down to a TMS, where loads and shipments are optimized based on factors like lowest cost freight or quickest delivery.

Whether the warehouse or yard can handle those plans in terms of factors such as available dock doors, labor to pick, and labor to load, historically has been considered a downstream execution challenge, says Klappich. However, suppliers are working toward integrated platforms that can address key constraints from each area. “We have opportunities to integrate those areas better,” says Klappich.

Data-centric integration between software like TMS and warehouse management systems (WMS) is only a “stop gap” on the road to a holistic platform for execution, according to Mike Mulqueen, a senior director with Manhattan Associates. The real trick, he says, is to make TMS aware of constraints at the warehouse level, so that if, for instance, a palletizer is down, the TMS planning engine or “solver” knows that. “I want to make sure that I can balance my transportation plan so my warehouse doesn’t get overloaded,” Mulqueen says.

Integration in itself won’t deliver this warehouse aware planning, Mulqueen adds. An underlying platform architecture synchronizes TMS, YMS and WMS activities for Manhattan’s users. “The integration platform is the foundation you will need, but the end goal is the complete synchronization of supply chain execution,” he says.

Fab Brasca, vice president of global logistics for JDA Software, agrees that more than data integration is needed between TMS and WMS. JDA is working on a “suite strategy” that allows users of JDA’s TMS to address distribution center constraints. Essentially, says Brasca, the TMS can model factors such as how many docks there are at a DC, what type of docks are available, and average loading/unloading times. “We have the ability, in the TMS, to model the throughput constraints of the warehouse,” says Brasca.

Another trend with TMS, adds Brasca, is toward “dynamic and iterative” planning where the optimization adjusts to order changes. With this type of planning engine, he adds, loads aren’t finalized until they have to be executed. “This is particularly important in the omni-channel retail environment, where the variability on orders is skyrocketing,” he says.

At SAP, there also is a tighter merging of TMS and WMS, says Markus Rosemann, SAP’s vice president of global solution management for logistics and order fulfillment. Where this integration at one time had to be relayed through SAP’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, SAP now offers direct integration between TMS and WMS processes. For example, when a shipment is created in the TMS, everything the warehouse needs to know to prepare surfaces in SAP’s WMS software. “It’s all about creating real transparency about plans, and then coordinating the operations accordingly,” says Rosemann.

So rather than having to deal with different numbering schemes for loads, orders or shipments, with direct integration between TMS and WMS, everything related to shipments has common numbering, and it is visible within SAP’s WMS solution. The WMS now also has a “shipping cockpit” user interface to coordinate with TMS processes and also display metrics. “The cockpit brings all the relevant information into one environment,” Rosemann says.
Making TMS solutions more “warehouse aware” is a valid goal, but with the trend toward omni-channel, fulfillment not only originates from DCs, but also from stores or suppliers doing drop shipments, according to Stephan Craig, a managing partner with enVista. So, a TMS needs to be more “inventory aware” regardless of where the inventory sits, Craig says. There are technology developments from suppliers that should help improve inventory awareness, but some of the fix will involve “good old fashioned cleaning up” of bad data and processes, he adds.
“Omni-channel distribution is driving the overall systems and data model to be more inventory aware in ways that most companies systems have not been in the past,” says Craig.
Some other trends in the TMS space, says Gary Gross, a vice president with HighJump Software, include the need for a TMS that can be used on a global basis, as well as one that allows planners to use back haul capacity. TMS solutions today also need to be adept at parcel shipment planning and execution.
Gross also sees the need for better integration of TMS with multiple SCE solutions. “Many times when we integrate systems for users, it’s a two- or three-way integration, not just one system to another,” says Gross.
Better yard control

Within the YMS market, dock scheduling functionality has been drawing more interest, says Klappich. The driver for this has been pressure from U.S. carriers under “hours of service” rules to have solid appointment windows at yards, rather than having to wait to load or unload.
Carriers who have to wait extra time may charge detention fees to the shipper, which is driving the need for more YMS and dock scheduling capability. “There is real money to be saved here,” says Klappich. “Companies are seeing detention penalties.”
Greg Braun, senior vice president of sales and marketing with C3 Solutions, agrees that there is strong interest in YMS and dock scheduling due to pressure from carriers. It’s even driving relatively smaller yards with fewer yard drivers or “hustlers” to inquire about YMS.
A YMS, says Braun, gives a company tight, real-time control over yard activities and assets, such as the number, location and type of trailers in the yard. For example, a YMS enables smoother “drop and hook” activities in which a carrier’s truck leaves a load and picks up another trailer. “You need more intelligence to manage yard management processes today,” he says.
At PINC Solutions, the company is applying its experience in real-time locating systems (RTLS) and yard management to the challenges of enterprise-wide logistics visibility. In May, PINC announced Enterprise Visibility Suite Version 4, a cloud-based platform that collects real-time data from sensor and data feeds, and uses the data for the tracking of trailer journeys and other execution processes.
According to Matt Yearling, PINC’s CEO, shippers can gain a real-time grasp over logistics based on such sensor feeds, which are an example of Internet of Things (IoT) technology. “We’re focused on supply chain execution powered by the Internet of Things,” he says. “Invariably what people are looking for is real-time information on trailer shipments, not just in their yards and facilities, but over the road as well.”
In a sense, supply chains can be viewed as one big yard, says Yearling, though with truck routes of several hours or more, you don’t need the pinpoint locating like that within a YMS.  A range of IoT-style feeds might be used for tracking goods in transit, from advanced telematics and onboard communications on newer trucks, to simpler feeds based on tracking of a driver’s cell phone signal. Yearling says PINC has also placed RFID tags on trailers to enable trailer tracking between points in a supply chain.
The problem with previous generations of supply chain visibility solutions, Yearling contends, is that they tended to rely on human inputs like keyboard updates to a portal, or phone calls to communicate exceptions. “Many companies are still very dependent on pen on paper, or fingers on keyboards, to track progress, and if that’s what you are relying on, you can’t have a truly accurate understanding of what is going on now, and what has transacted in the past,” says Yearling.
Yearling says PINC’s enterprise visibility solution augments TMS, YMS and WMS by providing a real-time view of progress and exceptions, and giving managers accurate measures on factors like gate velocity, which is a measure of how quickly trucks are clearing gates.
Starting upstream

Suppliers of SCE software, especially those with broader footprints in supply and demand planning, also are looking to tie SCE solutions into upstream planning. After all, says JDA’s Brasca, distribution orders flow from customer demand, so ideally, companies should be looking to link forecasting, replenishment planning, and sales & operations planning with SCE capacity.
For example, says Brasca, replenishment plans can be “bounced” against available resources at the TMS and WMS levels to see what is feasible and optimal. “This adds a whole other level to the efficiency of replenishment planning that most companies can only try to deal with as a downstream execution issue,” he says.
SAP’s Rosemann also sees a need to treat SCE resources in much the same way that manufacturing operations have when learning to optimize production capacity—as a network-wide balancing act, rather than one plant at a time. “What we’ve learned on the manufacturing side 20 years ago is now reaching a point of use in logistics,” he says. “As logistics gets increasingly complex with smaller shipment sizes and higher customer expectations around multi-channel, it requires a more sophisticated way of planning, scheduling and assigning resources.”

Companies mentioned in this article

C3 Solutions: c3solutions.com

enVista: envista.com

Gartner: gartner.com

HighJump: highjump.com

JDA Software: jda.com

Manhattan Associates: manh.com

PINC Solutions: pincsolutions.com

SAP: sap.com

Written By Roberto Michel, Editor at Large, September 01, 2014

Article Source http://www.mmh.com/article/tms_gets_more_warehouse_aware

Four Supply chain trends to watch in 2016

According to Grant Marshbank, COO of VSc Solutions, supply chains will face a number of challenges, he said: “Supply chain managers are already under huge pressure to adapt to turbulent economies, labour issues, and expansion into global markets.

“The bad news is that the rate of change isn’t going to slow down. The good news is that emerging trends hold opportunities to reduce both costs and carbon footprints, and enable exceptional customer service at the same time.”

1) Technology as core strategic driver

Aging systems that were implemented years ago to enable smoother operations are quickly being replaced by smarter technologies that easily incorporate trends like big data, the Internet of Things, and the coordination of multiple sources of data.

The demand is growing for technology that can successfully translate any electronic message into any format required by existing systems, allowing for full electronic data communication between client and supplier bases.

“Technology will only deliver the intended positive results if it is implemented with strategy and operations that adhere to best practice in supply chain management. Get basics right first. Not even the smartest technology can compensate for less-than-best practices,” he added.

2) Flexible, transparent, responsible supply chains

While agile and sustainable supply chains have been a buzzword for a number of years, 2016 will start to see the dominance of supply chains that have figured out how balance being flexible with reducing environmental impact and stakeholder demands for complete transparency.

Marshbank said: “Real time system integration, secure data exchange, visibility and traceability between disparate systems across multiple supply chains and industry verticals are just some of the options already available through technology,”

“The greatest barrier to the adoption of these technologies is a lack of understanding of the benefits combined with an expectation of high implementation costs.”

3) Small improvements will lead to big success

Optimisation of every component of the supply chain is already an imperative to growth and success. A new microscopic level of optimisation will further differentiate between competitors.

Predictive route planning and management solutions, intelligent storage and distribution space allocation software, as well as real-time integrated delivery tracking will become mainstream for both the biggest and the smallest of supply chains.

4) Think and do faster

Advances in technologies available to optimise supply chains have made faster implementation times a reality. “It is easier and more affordable for both big and small businesses to go live with a new system within two weeks of finalising paperwork,” explained Marshbank.

Further developments in consumer technology are also making it easier for multiple-use communication devices to be linked to existing company systems, reducing the need for additional expense and decreasing waiting times for custom mobile devices.

“Turbulent economic times don’t allow for big expenditure on trial-and-error technology. Service providers need to keep the bigger picture of sustained success in mind and be able to provide trusted advice on a plan that won’t cost and arm and a leg, and will deliver quick return on investment,” advised Marshbank.

“Most supply chain professionals already have a sound strategic plan in place. Instead of being sold a new system, they might just need some guidance on how to solve their pain points by repurposing their existing technologies.”

“Being able to blend systems and implement tools on a scalable basis is what sets the technology of the future apart from the unwieldy enterprise-wide software packages that were popular in the previous era,” said Marshbank.

Article Source :
The November Issue of Supply Chain Digital.

I Tell You What They Said About Slotting and Layout

image

Whether operating an existing warehouse or preparing for a new distribution center, an efficient layout and slotting plan developed from an in-depth analysis is an essential element of effective distribution center and warehouse operations. Properly slotting a facility reduces expensive labor costs and dramatically improves throughput by increasing pick and replenishment efficiencies, increasing order accuracy, and reducing ergonomic risks associated with improper picking and replenishment operations. A successful layout and slotting plan also improves the capability to meet inventory rotation requirements, such as FIFO (First In First Out) and LIFO (Last In First Out).

When discussing effective design, the focus should be on determining the level at which the product will be picked (full pallet, case pick or piece pick), the storage medium from which product will be picked (pallet rack, shelving, carton flow, etc.), the tools that will be utilized to facilitate the order picking process (paper pick sheets, voice-directed picking, pick to light, etc), and the method of picking to be executed.

The primary consideration when conducting a slotting analysis and making these determinations is a company’s SKU or product data. SKU information such as product dimension, weight and on-hand quantity are all key factors when determining the proper storage medium and handling methodology.

Though getting your hands around the collection of the full range of product data for each SKU may appear to be a daunting task (especially for organizations that distribute thousands of SKUs), recent advances in technology have greatly simplified the data acquisition and manipulation phase of the slotting analysis. One such technology used by AGI is our Velocity Management and Assignment module associated with our Warehouse Director Software.

Used as a standalone component in conjunction with our slotting services offering the VMA module provides a more effective and efficient process for determining appropriate size, location and assignment of SKU in forward pick areas.

Slotting deliverables can vary from complete warehouse layouts and schemas to focus fast pick areas or any number of intermediate requirements. Deliverables are provided in both Visio and excel spreadsheet form providing our clients with effective leave behind frameworks in order to manage evolving slotting requirements and adjustments.

Benefits of effective Layout and Slotting
○ Reducing travel distance to fast movers
○ Balancing the fast movers across aisles/bays to reduce congestion
○ Picking very slow movers from reserve storage
○ Sizing locations to satisfy required days-on-hand
○ Sizing locations to reduce stock-outs
○ Maximizing the location cube, resulting in less space required
○ Arranging products based on stackability (for pallet building)
○ Developing effective picking zones (category, customer, temperature, etc.)

Dear Reader,
We have the technology embeded inside our WMS. If you have a reason to realize it, just drop email to us. Don’t left behind the slotting or you will miss all benefits from it.

Product Slotting in Your Distribution Center

Below is a usefull article that show on how slotting management has an essential role in warehouse operation. Slotting management has widely implemented in warehouses or DC’s around the globe. By using slotting management, it can help your operation more productive and efficient through optimizing slot and space in warehouse and DC. Especially when you have a large SKU and high volume transaction.

SAMS WMS is an integrated warehouse management software which has already featured by slotting management. It can help our clients more effective in optimizing their space in warehouse. Our clients have gained the most benefit through implement this system.

If you interest or looking for WMS application for your DC or WHS, feel free to drop email to us at estikofh@ gmail.com

gambar rak whs

Product Slotting in Your Distribution Center.

Whether operating an existing warehouse or preparing for a new distribution center, an efficient slotting plan developed from an in-depth slotting analysis is an essential element of effective distribution center and warehouse operations.  Properly slotting a facility reduces expensive labor costs and dramatically improves throughput by increasing pick and replenishment efficiencies, increasing order accuracy, and reducing ergonomic risks associated with improper picking and replenishment operations. A successful slotting plan also improves the capability to meet inventory rotation requirements, such as FIFO (First In First Out) and LIFO (Last In First Out).

When discussing effective slotting, the focus should be on determining the level at which the product will be picked (full pallet, case pick, or piece pick), the storage medium from which product will be picked (pallet rack, shelving, carton flow, etc…), the tools that will be utilized to facilitate the order picking process (paper pick sheets, voice-directed picking, pick to light, etc…), and the method of picking to be executed.  The primary consideration when conducting aproduct slotting analysis and making these determinations is a company’s SKU or product data. SKU information such as product dimension, weight, and on-hand quantity are all key factors when determining the proper storage medium and handling methodology.

Though getting your hands around the collection of the full range of product data for each SKU may appear to be a daunting task (especially for organizations that distribute thousands of SKUs), recent advances in technology have greatly simplified the data acquisition and manipulation phase of the slotting analysis. One such technology used by a number of companies has the capability to not only calculate the length, height width and weight of an item, but will also feed these data records directly into a mainframe or PC host. The tasks of collecting and entering the dimension data can be completely automated resulting  in a significant reduction in the time, cost, labor, and potential human error that would normally be associated with performing the tasks manually.

Another important factor in the slotting analysis is the SKU or product velocity. Product velocity refers to the quantity and frequency of the SKU picked over a designated period of time. Some rules of thumb when considering the velocity of a SKU are:

Determine fast, medium and slow movers and place them in the appropriate storage medium (i.e. pallet flow, carton flow, shelving, etc.)Examine both average and peak-picking days.Store high-velocity SKUs in a readily accessible and ergonomically friendly area for ease of both picking and replenishment.Establish whether individual SKU velocities are affected by seasonality or special promotions.

Attempting to effectively slot your distribution center or warehouse requires careful consideration of many factors and is frequently made more complex by incomplete and/ or inaccurate order fulfillment data. Good data leads to positive results; bad or incomplete data to poor results. Some common oversights often made by supply chain professionals when developing a slotting plan on their own:

Not designing a system with sufficient flexibility to accommodate changing SKU’s or space needs.  A fatal flaw for companies dealing with continuously changing SKU velocities or experiencing significant growth within the three to five year horizon.Not taking the characteristics of their product into consideration.  When slotting, the velocity of a SKU must be considered in order to increase pick and replenishment efficiencies. Size and weight of the product must also be taken into consideration to ensure proper pallet or load building.Not providing a clear path for pickers.  A congested route not only poses a safety hazard, but also increases the time needed for an employee to fill an order.Not choosing the proper storage medium for each SKU.  The characteristics of each SKU (SKU data) should be the primary consideration when choosing the storage medium for a particular SKU. Choosing storage medium based on other factors often proves to be an expensive mistake.

Though it may sound like future expansion of a slotting system in an existing building can be a major headache at best, and futile at worst, that’s not always the case. You may have space you don’t even know about. Space limitation can often be dealt with by off-site storage. You can also make sure there aren’t a large number of empty pallets hanging around, eating up valuable (and costly) square-footage.

Ultimately, the perfect (though not always practical) scenario for effectively slotting a warehouse or distribution center is to fit it into pre-existing plans for a new structure-to design your building around the material handling system you want (if not now, then for future growth), and not design the material handling system around the building. It’s not as easy as it sounds. The per-square-foot budget allocation for construction of the building is what drives the train.  Planners often lose sight of the reason for the new building and the material handling system is frequently a last minute consideration. As the old cliché’ goes, they are unable to see the forest for the trees.

Whether designing an effective slotting system from scratch, or working within existing structural confines, the key to developing a successful slotting strategy is an in-depth understanding of product characteristics and movement. All you have to do is look at the beer industry to know how true this is. Years ago when there were only a handful of different types of beers most goods were shipped in full pallets. But this is more difficult today. With consumer demands constantly changing, and the introduction of microbreweries, there are literally hundreds of different beer products, which involve more sorting, more slotting, and more labor.

All this has created new and ever evolving challenges with the way we do business. The people who oversee the day-to-day operation of a bustling warehouse or distribution center are often too busy to implement or analyze the changes needed, no matter how rudimentary they may seem.  But supply chain professionals who know how to effectively slot their facility will possess a considerable and lasting economic advantage.

Written by
Paul Hansen. He is a Senior Project Engineer for Lakeland, FL-based TriFactor, a leading integrator of material handling systems. Paul has over 10 years experience in the industry and holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of South Florida. He can be contacted at phansen@trifactor.com

Omni-channel distribution—Moving at the speed of “now”

image

The pressure is on retailers to deliver anything, anytime, from anywhere. Three experts answer four key questions that will help traditional brick-and-mortar retailers revolutionize their use of WMS and their shipping processes on the way to a multi-channel transformation.

You walk in to your favorite retail store and spot an item you’d like to purchase. A new app on your smart phone lets you “scan” the UPC barcode, which automatically opens up a search engine that finds the same item for less. A few finger slides and clicks on your phone and the wheels are set in motion for you to receive that item the very next day—and you didn’t even have to wait in line at the register.

Welcome to the new world of retail where mobile technology, wireless networks, and e-commerce have added a whole new dimension to the consumer’s shopping experience—and a slew of challenges for the supply chains of traditional brick and mortar stores. It’s a trend that our experts see gaining momentum, as store sales remain flat and e-commerce business with next-day service levels continue to grow.

It’s all about keeping up with today’s tech savvy consumer. “Consumers want the ability to order anything, anytime, from anywhere,” says Albert Avalos, global vice president for Fortna, a distribution professional services and engineering firm. “Through social networks, significant backlash is instantly relayed if the experience is not exceptional.”

Thus the pressure is on for supply chains to deliver—literally. “As e-commerce becomes a larger percentage of the shipping volume, it’s taking less of a back seat in terms of the design of the operation,” notes Bob Silverman, senior vice president of supply chain and logistics solutions for commercial real estate firm Jones Lang LaSalle. “More facilities will be set up handling multiple channels with separate picking operations, replenished from a common inventory.”

Kevin Hume, principal with supply chain consulting firm Tompkins International, is experiencing the retail transformation firsthand. “For awhile, everyone was talking about the death of the brick and mortar store,” says Hume. “But we now have the technology for even the stores to be able to ship e-commerce orders.” By functioning as mini-fulfillment centers (FCs) all over the country, stores are able to support next-day shipping more cost-effectively.

Over the next few pages, our three experts shed light on how traditional brick and mortar retailers are making room for e-commerce and multiple distribution channels in their organizations. They respond to key questions and offer their thoughts on how best to go about this transformation.

Finally, they zoom in on how warehouse management systems (WMS) and other software solution providers are responding—from offering real-time visibility to available inventory to executing the most cost-effective method of fulfillment to service the most demanding consumer. In an increasingly competitive global retail environment, retailers may have no choice but to go with the flow.

Should you insource or outsource?
For traditional DCs servicing their own stores, adding e-commerce to the fold can be a daunting undertaking. Some may need outside help.

The decision to outsource will depend on e-tail’s volumes, according to Silverman. “When volume is low, it makes sense to keep it in-house—one inventory, lower costs.” As volume increases, however, he believes that outsourcing to a third-party logistics provider (3PL) becomes more attractive.

“E-commerce picks are very different and can suffer in a system designed to support larger brick-and-mortar picks,” says Silverman. “Specialized 3PLs focused on e-commerce often have the material handling equipment, systems, experience, and expertise to more efficiently process e-commerce orders than many of their own clients can do in-house.”

As larger throughput volumes eventually magnify the costs associated with splitting the inventory with a 3PL, it may justify consolidating and designing an operation with multiple picking options, to optimize both the bricks’ and the clicks’ picks. At some point, even larger volumes result in a facility getting too big. “Separate facilities may be required, and they can each be optimally located based on the different logistics considerations of the channels,” adds Silverman.

How do we pick? 
For most multi-channel DCs, one of the primary challenges revolves around picking. Many traditional operations are not set up to efficiently accommodate a large range of orders with varying units and lines per order characteristics. “Picking labor is often the single biggest cost within the four walls, and inefficient picking systems can have a huge impact on a DC operation’s costs,” cautions Silverman.

Retail replenishment to stores is typically “pulled” based on point-of-sale (POS) information. “This is usually a pick-to-cart or pick-to-voice/light into totes process, then the totes are consolidated and packed into store shipments,” explains Fortna’s Avalos. In contrast, retail distribution in response to new store openings, specific ads, and promotions are typically “pushed” and achieved using a put-to-store strategy or pack-and-hold operation.

E-commerce orders have a different profile from store orders. “That order profile is typically 1.2 lines per order, with about 30 percent to 60 percent one-line orders,” states Tompkins’ Hume. These orders are typically processed via cart zone picking or zone batch picking. For increased productivity, the single-line or single-unit orders are typically processed differently in a batched, high-speed packing operation in a separate area of the facility.

How do we ship from stores?
The ability to ship e-commerce orders from brick-and-mortar stores may be the strategy that most are anticipating. Why? Because processing and shipping from the store that’s closest to the person that wants it is the most cost-effective way to support a next-day shipment.

“Most of the major retailers we’re currently working with will be shipping from their stores this peak season,” says Hume. But the best way to accomplish this will vary by retailer.

According to Hume, some will select key stores that have the largest inventory—and those key stores may be defined by particular mixes of SKUs that they’ve identified as the highest volume of e-commerce items.

“They’re going to stockpile those SKUs at specific stores and make those stores forward-shipping systems, deploying full warehouse management capabilities,” explains Hume. “They may even leverage parcel manifesting technology, pushing the order down to the store where store employees can go out with a paper ticket to pick items off the store shelves and immediately prepare them for shipment.” He adds that store fulfillment can vary by store type. Low end stores may process 10 to 15 orders a day with minimal technology support and, at the other end, larger stores could have the capacity to ship hundreds of orders and require a mini-fulfillment center in the store’s backroom.

Avalos cautions that shipping from stores presents some challenges. “There might be licensing issues with putting warehouse management systems and transportation management systems [TMS] inside the stores. Plus contracts with parcel carriers may need to be modified to handle this strategy.” He also points out how some stores may not even have the space or the labor to pull it off. There also consistently needs to be real-time visibility to available store inventory.

What systems to use where?
One of the most critical requirements for an omni-channel retailer’s success lays in the planning and executing capabilities of its WMS and other information management systems.

First and foremost, an inventory management system that spans the entire supply chain gives managers a leg up in achieving real-time visibility—and in some cases might actually save the sale. Rather than having a customer walk away because she can’t find an item, today’s sales associate may be equipped with a handheld mobile device to help her find it in any of the other stores. Some stores have even set up kiosks for customers themselves to check inventory, purchase the items, and have it shipped directly to their homes.

Another critical component to making omni-channel’s “buy from anywhere, ship from anywhere” philosophy possible is a distributed order management (DOM) system. “DOM allows you to find all the rule sets and criteria of how you want to cost-effectively support that next-day shipment,” says Hume. “It has the visibility of inventory at all the different stores.”

DOM understands the delivery time frame and instantaneously makes a decision where to most cost-effectively drop that order and still provide the service level promised. “It can drop it into the DC, an e-commerce fulfillment center, or to an individual store.”

However when inventory is scarce and the “bricks and clicks” are sharing inventory with multiple DCs, setting up your DOM becomes especially challenging, says Avalos. “Who gets priority? How do you reserve inventory for each channel? Do you send that order to the store or send it to the DC or split it across multiple DCs?”

Within the WMS, the requirements may be simpler, but just as critical. Consideration must be given to the picking and waving logic that can handle retail order profiles (larger orders) and the smaller e-commerce orders.

“It’s not just the regular pick/pack/ship logic anymore,” says Avalos. “There are more permutations: zone batch picking, multi-order picking, pick and pass, priority processing, multi-carton processing, etc.”

Good cartonization logic coupled with up-to-date weights and measures can streamline packing and manifesting while saving freight by packing orders into the least number of cartons. The TMS must be able to handle service/cost tradeoffs and to track information, not just simply ship to residences and businesses. Real time information exchanges between the WMS and the web site to mobile devices is expected—it’s not an option. “In multi-channel systems, it’s critical to push out the status information in real time,” says Avalos.

In a consolidated multi-channel facility, the warehouse control systems (WCS) may now need to control a wider assortment of material handling systems. “WMS/WCS integration becomes more critical,” says JLL’s Silverman. “The need to know exactly where in the system an order is—specifically where on the conveyor it’s sitting—is greater with short windows between dropping orders and shipment cut-off.”

“When the WMS does not have the sophistication needed, many times the WCS makes up the gap,” adds Avalos. He cites how in some DCs the WMS may be controlling the processing of store orders, while WCS controls e-commerce fulfillment where specialized picking and processes are needed. “This is not always the best option, but is usually a ‘right now’ option.”

Last words
Today we’re talking about next-day shipments for e-commerce, but the industry is buzzing with rumors of big retailers moving into same-day shipments.

“To be able to do same-day shipment you’re going to have to be as geographically close to the customer as possible,” says Hume. “In addition, you will need robust systems that look at all the different points of distribution—including one that ships from a store—and orchestrates the most cost-effective place to meet that service level.”

2014 in Review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 640 times in 2014. If it were a cable car, it would take about 11 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

How to standout and differentiate your DC ?

gambar rak whs

What is an essential element which make a big difference among warehouse and distribution center? Like website, send your postal card or real estate, location is the most essential element. Location where you place your product in your warehouse or distribution center has significantly affected on productivity, order accuracy and even worker safety. By locating inventory in the optimal slots, you can improves the overall efficiency and productivity of your distribution operations. Put fast-moving items in the most accessible locations, kitted items kept together, heavy items placed into safety manner place for minimizing damage and reduce worker injure or accident, and optimized total storage capacity are several strategies to make a big difference in your warehouse or distribution center operation.

Slotting Management for Warehouse
Regardless of the operation, continuously optimized pick locations for each product is vital to increasing warehouse efficiency and reducing labor costs. But every environment is different and requires a unique set of slotting strategies.
Slotting management can optimize item slotting throughout facility and will have a positively impact on key warehouse metrics, i.e:
 Increased picker productivity
 Reduced replenishment volumes
 Shortened batch/wave completion times
 Improved warehouse space utilization
 Minimized product damage

How Slotting Management Works?
Slotting Management provides a solution to these problems by optimizing product placement or “slotting,” according to user-defined goals including storage capacity, volume balancing levels, slot sequencing, family grouping, seasonal parameters and racking criteria.

Slotting Optimization uses data on each product’s physical characteristics and order frequency to calculate a relative value for each position its slot might inhabit within your facility. It aggregates these values for all products, and compares millions of move combinations against your user-configured strategies to determine the optimal layout for your warehouse.

Slotting Management Advantages
With Slotting Optimization, you can:
 Determine the best placement of inventory
 Organize by velocity to maximize throughput
 Balance volumes to decrease bottlenecks
 Sequence by weight to improve outbound pallet integrity
 Solve space utilization problems by determining the appropriate storage capacity and volume-balancing levels
 Identify “golden zones” to reduce worker fatigue and accidents
 Keep similar items separated to reduce mispicks
 Maintain your preferred item sequencing and family groupings to improve customer service
 Group by product families determine optimal capacity of pick locations to reduce replenishment trips
 Apply customized filters to target specific SKUs for re-slotting
 Recommend incremental adjustments as products are added or deleted to meet seasonal demand, or to accommodate other changes as they occur

About SAM WMS
Slotting Management —part of SAM WMS, increasing workforce efficiency, shortens order fulfillment cycles, and maximizes throughput by determining the best location to slot your inventory. It also improves customer service by strategically grouping items together for fulfillment—and updating placement recommendations based on trends and seasonal variations.

SAM WMS platform-based approach to supply chain optimization—enables you to make timely, intelligent decisions as ordering trends change.
With SAM WMS, companies can solicit and optimize their picking performance, solve space utilization problem and shortened order completion time. Come with a rich graphical user interface and pre built interface file formats to enable rapid implementation.

Further information, feel free to contact us.